Utefans.Net -- Umm while I don't like Santorum technically he is correct.

Utefans.Net - Uniting the Fans Since 1998

Mobile - Home - Message Board - Best Stuff - Game Schedule - Photo Gallery - Quotable - Join!

Umm while I don't like Santorum technically he is correct.

Posted By: EducatedUfan
Date: Monday, February 27, 2012 at 10:24 am

Lemon v. Kurtzman, 403 U.S. 602 (1971) ("Our prior holdings do not call for total separation between church and state; total separation is not possible in an absolute sense.")

Committee for Public Education v. Nyquist - 413 U.S. 756

Yet, despite Madison’s admonition and the ‘sweep of the absolute prohibitions’ of the Clauses, this Nation's history has not been one of entirely sanitized separation between Church and State. It has never been thought either possible or desirable to enforce a regime of total separation.

<< [ Ignore EducatedUfan ] [Print This Message ] >>

Messages In This Thread

NEW: Is Santorum trying to torpedo his own campaign?
USS Utah - -- Monday 27 February 2012, at 09:52 am [ID# 1329857] [reply]

(6)

NEW: I would like Santorum to go away! (nm)
ConnecticutUte - -- Monday 27 February 2012, at 09:57 am [ID# 1329859] [reply]

(9)

NEW: It was just a matter of time. I think anyone that bases their campaign off of social issues this November needs to take a hike.
Virginia Ute - -- Monday 27 February 2012, at 09:57 am [ID# 1329860] [reply]

(14)

NEW: Nope, he is what you think he is. (nm)
REDrumU - -- Monday 27 February 2012, at 10:10 am [ID# 1329877] [reply]

(7)

NEW: He is santorum? (don't google that...) (nm)
Puget Ute - -- Monday 27 February 2012, at 11:48 am [ID# 1329970] [reply]

(2)

NEW: Welcome to the dominion political agenda.
Duhwayne - -- Monday 27 February 2012, at 10:22 am [ID# 1329887] [reply]

(2)

NEW: Umm while I don't like Santorum technically he is correct.
EducatedUfan - -- Monday 27 February 2012, at 10:24 am [ID# 1329888] [reply]

(1)

NEW: Also the "wall of seperation" that every anti religious person uses is not in the constituion it was in a Letter that Jefferson wrote to the Danbury Baptist and is taken TOTALLY out of context.
EducatedUfan - -- Monday 27 February 2012, at 10:32 am [ID# 1329890] [reply]

NEW: But what people that want more religious influence in government fail to grasp is that once you break that seperation, you have an established state religion and discrimination against other faiths/ethos etc. sets in immediately. (nm)
Homer_Crimson - -- Monday 27 February 2012, at 11:32 am [ID# 1329945] [reply]

NEW: You could argue that with any politically motivated institution. (nm)
EducatedUfan - -- Monday 27 February 2012, at 11:41 am [ID# 1329959] [reply]

NEW: Exactly, which is why we need hard limits on political spending and get corporate money out of our election system.
Homer_Crimson - -- Monday 27 February 2012, at 11:43 am [ID# 1329964] [reply]

NEW: Fat chance. All I am arguing is that Religions are allowed full participation in government despite what people might think or hope.
EducatedUfan - -- Monday 27 February 2012, at 11:52 am [ID# 1329971] [reply]


Prev	Index	Next

DISCLAIMER: UteFans.Net is not affiliated with the University of Utah, except that the owner, operators and contributing members are students, alumni, and rabid fans of the U. Additionally, the owner and operators of Utefans.Net are not responsible for the actions of those who use this public forum. By contributing to this forum you agree to abide by the Rules of Conduct outlined on the Post Message page.

Forum - Boardmail - Profile - Schedule - Events - Photos - Archive - Quotable - Join!